Sorry to be a lawyer about this, but is there decent evidence of their intention both here and in other locations? Is this something you’d consider suing them over, either for an injunction on their co-scheduling the conference or for damages?
__________________________________
___________________________
We need to defend our meeting and our Academy!!! Let's keep our dates, build the best meeting in history, broaded our audience, and beat them at their own game.
The RIH/Miriam Department of Family and Community medicine will be there in force.
______________________________
Probably by bringing in the other primary care specialties and having something of a policy focus, with big political names. There will be an election in November, and candidates will be looking for places to speak...
____________________________
All docs need to know, if they don’t already, that PriMed is all “lectures” sponsored by the pharmaceutical industries to sell their drug! Without dissemination of this information and a boycott by ALL physicians and other health care providers, PriMed will continue to succeed.
I think to be effective in attracting folks away from Primed we'd have to change the meeting date by about a month or more. I visited the web site. They are offering only 8.75 CME and will have "case-based" CME but have not yet declared what the cases will about. We may have a chance to blitz our members to get them to come. I don't know.....
May I suggest that we all get some input from some trusted colleagues to see what they think and then meet January 2.
_____________________
I think Don raised an interesting question. I e-mailed him to ask if we would need proof of intent to have a lawyer send a "cease and desist" type of letter. I would think the legal standard for damages or an injunction would be much higher.
I would vote for either keeping the meeting in June as we planned and really pushing the membership to support our chapter or moving to early April if the hotel has availability. I guess some of my choice would depend on what feedback you get.
_________________________________________
I agree with Dr Fine,
Let’s keep the same program and fight..
we will be there.
_____________________________--
Perhaps I am naïve. But what does Pri-Med have to gain by competing with the RIAFP? I do not think the drug companies (who seem to be the $ behind pri-med) are that stupid.
I think the idea of a one day meeting--perhaps at the Warwick Crowne plaza would attract the docs from the city and "us country folks in
A few years back there used to be a couple of single day meetings in different seasons. I found these easier to attend. They were also less costly-- or seemed that way because the cost was spread out.
Thanks for all you do.
How can we complain directly to PriMed?
Have they been addressed re this?
_______________________________
Thanks for the info about PriMed.
I will make every attempt to attend this year's RIAFP conference,
however you decide to hold it.
I hope the national AAFP can be of some assistance in at least
publicizing this trend if not objecting to it more formally.
I have attended a couple of PriMed events and find them biased. The
information you are sharing today seals my decision to boycott them
altogether from now on, and I would urge the RIAFP to suggest that all
its members do the same.
Thanks again for the info, and Happy New Year!
No comments:
Post a Comment